Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120705
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '17 at 17:28
Run Duration	666 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 76.7 1-Core 51.5 2-Core 99.5 48% 75.9 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 278 29% 233 Pts	64-Core 273 17% 273 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.1% Average	Lighting 55.3 Reflection 59.3 Parallax 51.3 45% 55.3 fps	MRender 73 Gravity 59.1 Splatting 57.9 51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 504GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 84 227924158 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12711 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 7 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 266906522 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 38423 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2157 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 15362 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032856 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 63 454230042 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 60129542170 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 19 227924158 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 98 7 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 98 7 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2252 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 7795365682314 (F1) Unknown 100 253 938587746 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3849939150	46.7% Average	Read 98.8 Write 63.8 Mixed 28.3 47% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.38 98% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 68%
Hitachi HTS541640J9SA00 40GB 229 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 82GB free Firmware: SB1OC74P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 192 192 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 5270 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 7755 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1631 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 16 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 83 83 172056 (C2) HDA temperature 250 250 223339151382 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	26.7% Poor	Read 53.3 Write 39.5 Mixed 24.1 29% 39 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.29 70% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 26%
Hitachi HTS542560K9SA00 60GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 82GB free Firmware: BB1OC3JP Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 223 223 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 5439 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 6942 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1331 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 54677 (C2) HDA temperature 239 239 214749151255 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	25.8% Poor	Read 50 Write 39.7 Mixed 26.7 29% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.31 70% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 32%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB 7,722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 116GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	10% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 11 Mixed 11.8 17% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.52 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.5 67% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 37%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 766 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 95GB free, PID a83a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	8.81% Terrible	Read 25.3 Write 10.4 Mixed 14.4 19% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.64 4K Write 0.73 4K Mixed 0.71 59% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.81% Great: 35%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB 9,471 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 16GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	3.05% Terrible	Read 11.3 Write 3.49 Mixed 3.05 6% 5.94 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.003 10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.05% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBXL F3-10666CL9-4GBXL 8GB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 9.4 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.9 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	48x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	40x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $54Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	5x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,822 samples	6x
CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 54 samples	6x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,501 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16