Acer Aspire E5-411

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire E5-411 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer EA41_BM
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '20 at 14:34
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	84%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2940 3,995 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Memory 48.3 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 37.5 25% 35.6 Pts	4-Core 71.2 8-Core 71.7 10% 71.4 Pts	64-Core 76.6 5% 76.6 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 087F) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.08 Parallax 0.97 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 184 198 208 206 206 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.9% Average	Read 227 Write 222 Mixed 198 SusWrite 196 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 15.8 71% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 90.2 DQ Mixed 106 79% 104 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 128%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 10GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 8.6 8.6 8.8 9.1 8.1 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	9.58% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 6.2 Mixed 6 SusWrite 8.1 11% 9.25 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.3 140% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.58% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GB 6,120 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire E5-411 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-411

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	33x
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	22x
Celeron N2940IntelBench 33%, 3,995 samples	15x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	96x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 6,155 samples	14x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	13x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16