Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130117
Uptime	10.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '17 at 13:45
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 76.2 1-Core 59.6 2-Core 115 52% 83.5 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 284 30% 239 Pts	64-Core 305 19% 305 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gigabyte(1458 2556) 1GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.11.4 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Lighting 16.6 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 22.4 14% 18.8 fps	MRender 14 Gravity 15.3 Splatting 19 14% 16.1 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 120GB 1,958 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 100 194212486 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -68521908188655 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 532 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 86 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 32 53 77312884768 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 118 100 194212486 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 28160 (EA) Unknown 0 0 39936 (F1) Unknown 0 0 39936 (F2) Unknown 0 0 61376	26.5% Poor	Read 124 Write 84 Mixed 88.2 22% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 8.81 50% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 15.2 DQ Write 59.5 DQ Mixed 8.85 15% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 56%
Hitachi HUA722050CLA330 500GB 1,077 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 286GB free Firmware: JP2OA39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 65538 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 97 (03) Spinup time 162 162 25783763200 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4582 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 34 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 56470 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 345 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 4898 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 4898 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 219044446247 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	62.3% Good	Read 98.8 Write 119 Mixed 79.5 74% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.47 95% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 77%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 45GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 321 (03) Spinup time 178 176 2083 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4315 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24784 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 652 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 112 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4202 (C2) HDA temperature 106 101 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	49.8% Average	Read 76 Write 97.5 Mixed 82.1 64% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.25 80% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-038.A00LF 4x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 14.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 10.3 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16