Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 8 days ago.
SystemGigabyte H270-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 18 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 640 x 480 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 02 '20 at 22:08
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$181
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 184
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 355
48% 354 Pts
64-Core 356
24% 356 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$125
CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 86.8
54% 70.5 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 52.1
38% 59.4 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 51%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 160 157 162 165 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 469
Mixed 398
SusWrite 194
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 56.4
198% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$79
542GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 93 93 92 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 88
Write 87
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 93
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$97
33GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 53.3
Write 56.3
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 57.2
38% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST4000NM0033 4TB
889GB free
Firmware: NS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 124 123 123 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 125
Write 128
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 123
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 105%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
6.88% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 13
Mixed 6
SusWrite 17
17% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.88%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 4ATF25664AZ-2G3B1 Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Kingston KHX2133C14/8G 18GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
2048, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.8% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 20.5
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-H270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $687
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $250Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $181
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback