Asrock FM2A78M-ITX+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M-ITX+  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160114
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateOct 02 '20 at 08:11
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 88.7
36% 57.5 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 223
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 226
15% 226 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 24.2
17% 23.9 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 28
16% 22.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 27 24 27 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$73
36GB free
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 56 64 77 72 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 209
Write 107
Mixed 155
SusWrite 71
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 18.7
68% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 69.8
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 90.8
68% 89.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 74%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$55
318GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 178 204 193 3.9 113 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 244
Write 225
Mixed 205
SusWrite 153
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 11.8
59% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 18
22% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 91%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
32GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 13 16 17 19 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 21.9
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 16.3
29% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.2
133% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.5% Poor
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical FM2A78M-ITX+ Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-ITX+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $379Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback