Asrock FM2A78M-ITX+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M-ITX+  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160114
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateOct 02 '20 at 08:11
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 22.1
2-Core 72
34% 51.7 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 199
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 24.2
17% 23.9 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 28
19% 22.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 27 24 27 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 75%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
36GB free
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 56 64 77 72 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 209
Write 107
Mixed 155
SusWrite 71
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 18.7
68% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 69.8
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 90.8
68% 89.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 73%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
318GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 178 204 193 3.9 113 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 244
Write 225
Mixed 205
SusWrite 153
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 11.8
59% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 18
22% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 92%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
32GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 13 16 17 19 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 21.9
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 16.3
29% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.2
133% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.5% Poor
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78M-ITX+ Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-ITX+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback