Today's hottest deals

NCR VEGAS-7840

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNCR VEGAS-7840  (all builds)
MotherboardNCR Vegas1
Memory18.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191111
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 23:53
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 64.1
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 201
67% 122 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 400
49% 373 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 9.77
Parallax 7.03
5% 7.8 fps
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 13.6
9% 9.93 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
480gb PCIe Drive 480GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PNPC002A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 335 249 231 148 196 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.6% Good
Read 134
Write 650
Mixed 147
SusWrite 233
67% 291 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 19.3
52% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 431
366% 540 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 137%
Seagate GoFlexSatellite 500GB
173GB free, PID 6338
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 34
Write 36.2
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 20.9
39% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 31%
WD Elements 2TB
557GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 35
Write 35.7
Mixed 29
SusWrite 21
40% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
64.2% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 22
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 20.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback