Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180608
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '20 at 22:24
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 76.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 205 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 600 60% 489 Pts	64-Core 772 48% 772 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0521) CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.2 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.5% Above average	Lighting 66.6 Reflection 67.2 Parallax 83.4 54% 72.4 fps	MRender 70.3 Gravity 67 Splatting 56 52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM11.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 411 Write 297 Mixed 66.5 56% 258 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 1.2 9% 5.13 MB/s	DQ Read 66.1 DQ Write 14.2 DQ Mixed 26.4 23% 35.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 6GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 142 139 136 173 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 108 Write 107 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 151 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 236GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 129 130 119 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 139 Write 127 Mixed 20 SusWrite 126 133% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$83 8,676 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 31.9 98% 34.2 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 32.3 SC Mixed 24.7 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 87 46% 87 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,384x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	805x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	470x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	422x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	294x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	293x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	151x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	387x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	240x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	206x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $476

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16