| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-DVS R3.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181108 |
| Uptime | 2.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 01 '20 at 21:00 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 68% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.1%
Average
|
53% 101 Pts
|
37% 280 Pts
|
21% 339 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.4%
Poor
|
26% 27.9 fps
|
25% 30.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 274 294 318 331 317 MB/s
|
66.3%
Good
|
63% 279 MB/s
|
87% 31.1 MB/s
|
155% 208 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB
759GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 35 36 37 36 MB/s
|
19.8%
Very poor
|
26% 34.3 MB/s
|
148% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
34.5%
Below average
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
23% 8.17 GB/s
|
22% 179 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-DVS R3.0 Builds (Compare 91 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R3.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 20x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 9x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 10x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $322 |