Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171227
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '20 at 19:49
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Memory 93.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 267 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 503 8-Core 495 67% 499 Pts	64-Core 510 32% 510 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 112 Parallax 98.9 88% 106 fps	MRender 95.6 Gravity 97.8 Splatting 98.5 80% 97.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,912 Write 1,400 Mixed 570 284% 1,294 MB/s	4K Read 51.3 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 50.7 218% 81.5 MB/s	DQ Read 873 DQ Write 778 DQ Mixed 620 521% 757 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 30GB free Firmware: SAFM02.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 460 463 489 488 481 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 487 Mixed 364 SusWrite 464 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 97.6 4K Mixed 40.4 150% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 183 185% 298 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 111%
Adata SU650 480GB-$89 17,796 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 397GB free Firmware: V8X02c08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 370 370 388 388 388 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Read 408 Write 378 Mixed 333 SusWrite 372 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 90.8 4K Mixed 35.8 133% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 196 152% 205 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 99%
Hgst HUS726T4TALE6L4 4TB 592 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 3TB free Firmware: VKGNW460 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 229 226 228 225 229 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 207 Write 200 Mixed 98.9 SusWrite 225 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 1.6 8% 3.73 MB/s	DQ Read 3.7 DQ Write 7.1 DQ Mixed 4.8 4% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 27%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 10GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 121 126 131 119 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 147 Write 138 Mixed 94.9 SusWrite 119 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB 947 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 478GB free, PID a003 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 69 69 70 70 70 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 67.9 Write 30.7 Mixed 36.4 SusWrite 66.9 65% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 44%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 399GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 84.7 Write 56 Mixed 52 SusWrite 86.1 92% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 13,205 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 37 MC Mixed 31.6 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 37.6 SC Mixed 27.4 77% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 60.1 67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	1,765x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	539x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	274x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	455x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	349x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	242x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	171x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	160x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	73x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	171x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	117x
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 83%, 37,519 samples	99x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $736

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16