HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131008
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '20 at 14:42
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 186 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 468 49% 391 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Lighting 25 Reflection 18.9 Parallax 25.6 20% 23.2 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 26.3 Splatting 19.3 20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-240 240GB 1,980 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN4763 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 8.6 9.3 21 21 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 442 Write 408 Mixed 345 SusWrite 19.9 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 10.9 54% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 56.1 DQ Write 7.4 DQ Mixed 13.7 15% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 92%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45 23,554 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 64GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 76 71 63 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 69.8 Write 73.5 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 71.4 49% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 24GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.7 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 80.8 50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	227x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	197x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	170x

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	492x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	296x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	20x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	19x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16