Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180830
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 13:36
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 311
91% 173 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 1004
96% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,611
100% 1,611 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.6% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 108
Parallax 100
84% 104 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 96
Splatting 94
77% 94.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,260
Write 1,885
Mixed 1429
412% 1,858 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 64.8
210% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,305
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 998
760% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
19GB free
Firmware: M0CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 209 222 214 196 196 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 377
Write 226
Mixed 199
SusWrite 211
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 22.7
93% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 144
125% 183 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 99%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
68GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 355 352 348 346 355 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 366
Mixed 293
SusWrite 352
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 34.3
129% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 133
157% 273 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
206GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 114 92 100 115 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 174
Write 143
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 122
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $792
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback