PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Lenovo 7052A9G (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO |
Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120418 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 01 '20 at 13:19 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.5%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 107 108 108 117 93 MB/s
|
78.4%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
773GB free, PID 3323
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 24 24 23 MB/s
|
19%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown RMR1870EC58E9F1333 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
51.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 93x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 8x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 29x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $250 |