Lenovo 20BHS1KF0J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20BHS1KF0J  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BHS1KF0J
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 12:48
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 181
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 283
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2100M
Legend(17AA 221E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2650
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
7.93% Terrible
Lighting 9.13
Reflection 7.65
Parallax 8.78
7% 8.52 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 9.91
9% 11 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TNF-N3A0A 128GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 139 142 143 149 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 476
Write 309
Mixed 345
SusWrite 148
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 39.6
133% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 176
146% 210 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 0824 D3SS56082XH12AA 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 34%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback