Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 86.7 2-Core 140 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 335 36% 284 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8690M 122 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 05BD) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	3.91% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 6.62 Parallax 6.75 3% 5.76 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 7.83 5% 6.41 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.91% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: 08TH SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 217 208 206 201 202 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 385 Write 235 Mixed 223 SusWrite 205 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 10.6 72% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 91.2 DQ Mixed 23.3 39% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB 943 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16.5 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 19.4 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	1,723x
Radeon HD 8690MAMDBench 4%, 122 samples	11x
Radeon HD 8600MAMDBench 5%, 1,068 samples	7x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	156x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	76x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	72x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16