Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.80GHz-$100 1,546 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Memory 44.7 1-Core 1.8 2-Core 7.2 16% 17.9 Pts	4-Core 12 8-Core 15.4 2% 13.7 Pts	64-Core 28.8 2% 28.8 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% EVGA(3842 2619) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 1.78 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 1.78 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900210 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 65 91 73 95 94 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.1% Below average	Read 117 Write 97.8 Mixed 107 SusWrite 82 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 27.7 4K Mixed 14.8 58% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 77.7 DQ Write 93.4 DQ Mixed 79.4 62% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 87%
Maxtor 6Y080M0 80GB 614 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 71GB free Firmware: YAR51HW0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 55 48 53 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 48.3 Write 54.5 Mixed 37.4 SusWrite 50.2 35% 47.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.57 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 0.5 SC Mixed 2.5 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16