Asus P5N32-E SLI PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5N32-E SLI PLUS (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '20 at 20:39
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5450-$299 5,870 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 35.2 2-Core 77.6 40% 60.4 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 141 20% 146 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Lighting 44.7 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 38.6 36% 38.1 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 42 Splatting 36.9 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB 5,433 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 93 100 104 104 104 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.3% Below average	Read 124 Write 87.2 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 98 22% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 16 63% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 18.5 DQ Write 32.1 DQ Mixed 19.5 16% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 97%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1AQ1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 136 136 132 127 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 140 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 131 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 72%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB 1,584 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID c96a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.3 4.4 0.1 3.9 5 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	4.79% Terrible	Read 22.2 Write 1 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 4.6 8% 8.25 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.79% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 4 14% 4.87 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5N32-E SLI PLUS Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N32-E SLI PLUS

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	3x
Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E6850Intel $57Bench 40%, 4,150 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTX 285NvidiaBench 9%, 2,842 samples	2x
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
CS90 0 240GB SSDPNYBench 67%, 400 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x
SU 630 480GBAdataBench 64%, 98 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	4x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16