PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | QBEX QBEX-H61H2-M17 (all builds) |
Motherboard | QBEX QBEX-H61H2-M17 |
Memory | 12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121130 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 30 '20 at 20:33 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 99% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
47.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 71 99 118 92 72 MB/s
|
23.7%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
671GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 49 69 68 76 76 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
79GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 15 20 23 27 26 MB/s
|
12.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1333 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
45.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 19x |
Core i3-3210Intel $70Bench 57%, 7,331 samples | 8x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 13x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 3x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $28 |