Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 17:32
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 132
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 790
76% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 37.1
31% 35.3 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 36.1
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.86% Terrible
Lighting 6.73
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 8.91
6% 9.07 fps
MRender 8.43
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 16.7
10% 10.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 569
Write 358
Mixed 274
88% 400 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 28.3
126% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 405
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 303
234% 323 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 141%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
196GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 19 19 7.4 9.7 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 21.4
Write 18.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 13.6
21% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-029.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 14.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback