bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	90.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DX58SO
Memory	7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130729
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '20 at 17:09
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 980-$148 2,215 User benchmarks, average bench 75% J1PR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 174 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 496 50% 406 Pts	64-Core 626 39% 626 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2068) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.2% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 108 Parallax 106 94% 110 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 102 Splatting 80.4 83% 105 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ZTSSD-S11-120G-P 120GB 479 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM10.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 109 62 87 59 36 MB/s Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.2% Above average	Read 256 Write 212 Mixed 212 SusWrite 74.3 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 25.1 94% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 148 123% 178 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 84%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB 9,968 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 155GB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 9.4 17 18 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	7.03% Terrible	Read 7 Write 10.7 Mixed 8.2 SusWrite 17.4 8% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 36% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 7.03% Great: 56%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 13,609 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 2TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 365 373 373 375 372 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 368 Write 324 Mixed 117 SusWrite 370 214% 295 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.8 564% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 213%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 17.4 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 9 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,022x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,566x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16