Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive377% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 14:36
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 844
85% 688 Pts
64-Core 1088
67% 1088 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2627 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 158
Parallax 139
124% 150 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 146
Splatting 114
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1988 2136 2149 2052 1747 1653 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
377% Outstanding
Read 2647
Write 2,198
Mixed 1,533
SusWrite 1,954
467% 2,083 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 87.3
306% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,359
DQ Write 1,228
DQ Mixed 1,280
964% 1,289 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 377%
Great: 393%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
116GB free
Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1409 1333 1424 1452 1504 1325 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,410
Write 1,057
Mixed 996
SusWrite 1,408
274% 1,218 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 36
199% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 670
DQ Mixed 779
584% 784 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 236%
Great: 259%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
97GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 429 424 442 412 422 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176
51GB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 205 212 216 216 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
23GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 95 95 101 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 182
Write 148
Mixed 68
SusWrite 97.1
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80%
Great: 96%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
3GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 116
Write 115
Mixed 76.1
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2GB free
Firmware: CC25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 109
Write 65.9
Mixed 68.4
61% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 4400 C19 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3666 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 47.7
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 46.6
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 45.3
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 112%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $929
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback