Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 10:50
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 79.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 309
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 1,046
100% 827 Pts
64-Core 1488
92% 1488 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 91
60% 78 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 57
54% 67.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$117
237GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 492 492 494 494 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 491
Mixed 404
SusWrite 492
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 52.4
184% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 356
270% 363 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1864 1861 1852 1858 1834 1821 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,411
Write 1,946
Mixed 911
SusWrite 1,848
398% 1,779 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 73.4
259% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1310
DQ Write 1201
DQ Mixed 1,094
865% 1,202 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 345%
Great: 353%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
238GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 492 492 492 492 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 491
Mixed 443
SusWrite 492
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 61.5
212% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 133%
Great: 131%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
952GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 84 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 89.3
Write 94.2
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 94.5
69% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
917GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 83 84 81 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
47% Average
Read 81.2
Write 74.2
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 82.3
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$192
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 36.4
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 36.5
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $847
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback