NEC PC-VK12EZCCNJGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemNEC PC-VK12EZCCNJGE  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC MS-N0F1
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 03:57
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MMR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 857
Micro-FCBGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 31.7
2-Core 62
39% 55.9 Pts
4-Core 54.7
8-Core 54.4
7% 54.6 Pts
64-Core 59.3
4% 59.3 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Device(1BCF A02D) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2455
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.92% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 0.73
Parallax 0.84
1% 0.85 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.39 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.92%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNS Series mSATA PCI-E 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TA2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 141 191 177 184 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 386
Write 249
Mixed 279
SusWrite 175
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 29.7
96% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 187
148% 206 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 K4B2G0846D-HCH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 12.3
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback