Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR) 17,422 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Memory 45 1-Core 49 2-Core 94.9 37% 63 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 138 19% 141 Pts	64-Core 151 9% 151 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 8348) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	3.36% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 4.15 Parallax 5.16 3% 4.47 fps	MRender 3.81 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.52 3% 4.08 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.36% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 804GB free (System drive) Firmware: JU001C Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 101 Mixed 1 36% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.1% Poor	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 11.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 5.6 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	55x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	26x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	17x

SSD
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
Burst 480GBPatriotBench 76%, 16,899 samples	4x

RAM
HP24D4S7S8MB-4 1x4GBKingstonBench 31%, 777 samples	12x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	10x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16