| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | EVGA X299 FTW K (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191204 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 29 '20 at 02:22 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
81% 148 Pts
|
86% 725 Pts
|
107% 1,724 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 4050 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
143%
Outstanding
|
147% 218 fps
|
169% 216 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 428 433 432 439 415 MB/s
|
94.7%
Outstanding
|
85% 378 MB/s
|
139% 51.6 MB/s
|
158% 239 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
350GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 452 453 453 456 453 MB/s
|
119%
Outstanding
|
102% 455 MB/s
|
181% 64.4 MB/s
|
266% 356 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.1%
Average
|
49% 17.3 GB/s
|
35% 12.1 GB/s
|
46% 87.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X299 FTW K Builds (Compare 248 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: EVGA X299 FTW K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 29x |
| Core i9-10920XIntel $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples | 26x |
| Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples | 26x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 22x |
| RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 20x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $955 |