Supermicro X9SRL-F

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9SRL-F (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9SRL-F
Memory	10.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150116
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '20 at 16:54
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	59%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 83 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 167 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 467 48% 387 Pts	64-Core 626 39% 626 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3418) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.5% Below average	Lighting 51.4 Reflection 48.3 Parallax 13.2 42% 37.7 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 25 Splatting 31.6 20% 23.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.Y SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 135 145 226 176 242 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 390 Write 66 Mixed 297 SusWrite 184 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 26.3 89% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 6.2 DQ Mixed 67 75% 136 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 111%
Seagate BarracudaFas 1TB 289 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 757GB free Firmware: 0002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.32% Terrible	Read 30.2 Write 26.5 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 18.5 6% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 5.9 19% 5.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 8.32% Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 123GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 109 136 152 138 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 131 Write 93 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 130 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB 7,574 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 519GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 17 17 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 7.5 Write 28.3 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 16.2 28% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.6 138% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-138.A00LF 2x16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49% Average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 9.4 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9SRL-F Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRL-F

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2640 v2IntelBench 59%, 406 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2620 v2IntelBench 60%, 2,742 samples	1x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	2x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	2x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	1x
X100 128GBSanDiskBench 73%, 1,695 samples	1x

RAM
36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 4x8GBMicronBench 70%, 42 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 4x8GBCorsairBench 83%, 559 samples	1x
BLS8G3D169DS3.16F 4x8GBCrucialBench 83%, 25 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $504

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16