Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory52.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime18 Days
Run DateSep 28 '20 at 12:52
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 721
76% 608 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.81% Terrible
Lighting 6.63
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 8.19
5% 8.65 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 7
Splatting 15.4
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.81%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 99.9
Reflection 110
Parallax 113
81% 108 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 96.4
Splatting 93.7
90% 112 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1531 1010 927 879 832 802 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,272
Write 1,777
Mixed 1,247
SusWrite 997
299% 1,323 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 58.5
196% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 962
720% 961 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 215%
Great: 347%
Jmicron Tech 256GB
35GB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 637
Write 702
Mixed 667
150% 669 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 29.5
94% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 125
93% 123 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM CMSX64GX4M2A2666C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 27
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 27.4
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback