Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 61,910 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	50.3% Above average	Memory 56 1-Core 72.1 2-Core 132 50% 86.7 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 380 38% 310 Pts	64-Core 367 23% 367 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Graphics 8,935 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Device(19E5 3E06) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: Q3 2018 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	4.52% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 8.58 Parallax 6.5 4% 6.83 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 5.13 Splatting 6.83 5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.52% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E256 256GB 1,612 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: C286402 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 370 Write 253 Mixed 226 63% 283 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 20.6 4K Mixed 15 49% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 65 DQ Mixed 114 84% 112 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB 26,973 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.3% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 18 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.6 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 5 2500UAMDBench 49%, 61,910 samples	1x
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	1x
Radeon Vega 8 Mobile GraphicsAMDBench 8%, 8,935 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 89%, 3,055 samples	1x
MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 199%, 3,806 samples	1x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 2x4GBMicronBench 68%, 16,220 samples	1x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 8,423 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16