Asrock H310M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 125% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 118% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H310M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '20 at 05:46
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 96.3 1-Core 154 2-Core 296 100% 182 Pts	4-Core 593 8-Core 1,094 101% 844 Pts	64-Core 1,102 68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% PNY(196E 1211) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 166 Reflection 179 Parallax 166 135% 170 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 167 Splatting 120 109% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 171 124 114 109 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 459 Write 429 Mixed 304 SusWrite 153 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 79.2 4K Mixed 37.6 131% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 339 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 222 193% 286 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 113%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 11GB free Firmware: DXT08B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 462 Write 248 Mixed 174 64% 294 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 22.8 111% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 59 102% 203 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 516GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 100 101 101 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 113 Write 100 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 100 72% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 2x8GB 2,668 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 24.7 89% 31.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 26.2 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 52.9 76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H310M-HDV - $60

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	319x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	317x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	194x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	174x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	118x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	103x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	39x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 17,908 samples	46x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	35x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16