Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131106
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 28 '20 at 04:59
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 137
59% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 404
40% 329 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 19.3
17% 21.3 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 75 88 91 55 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 479
Write 413
Mixed 351
SusWrite 120
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 30.7
106% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 158
146% 224 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 99%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
200GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 84 84 84 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 98.5
Mixed 85
SusWrite 83.2
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 65%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
223GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 108 107 108 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 110
Write 99
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 107
72% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 76%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
140GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 92
Write 54.8
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 94.1
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 62%
Fujitsu MHZ2320BH G1 320GB
60GB free
Firmware: 0040020C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 54 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 56
Mixed 39
SusWrite 54.7
38% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.6
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback