Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '20 at 18:13
Run Duration	257 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 68.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 227 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 910 81% 683 Pts	64-Core 1,253 78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 156 Parallax 146 121% 150 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 145 Splatting 118 104% 128 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1534 1909 1884 1933 1940 1815 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	330% Outstanding	Read 2,656 Write 1,869 Mixed 997 SusWrite 1,836 410% 1,839 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 70.5 239% 86.5 MB/s	DQ Read 923 DQ Write 755 DQ Mixed 834 626% 837 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 330% Great: 353%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 36GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 323 323 323 323 323 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 486 Mixed 466 SusWrite 337 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 88.2 4K Mixed 52.8 175% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 365 275% 367 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 129%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 137 138 137 136 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 126 Write 113 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 136 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 88%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35 9,368 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 220GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 80 79 80 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 73.4 Write 75.3 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 79.2 50% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 50%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 41GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 72 73 66 72 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 74 Write 53.7 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 70.2 44% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB 8,778 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 3.2 4.8 5.2 5.2 5.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 16.9 Write 12.5 SusWrite 5.6 13% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.6 148% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$192 7,103 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.1% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 22.2 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 21.9 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16