To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory61.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 15:53
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 182
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 665
60% 504 Pts
64-Core 843
52% 843 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Asus(1043 0421) 1GB
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 25.2
16% 21.1 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 19
Splatting 20.1
15% 18 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 256GB 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 835 816 413 385 465 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,604
Write 999
Mixed 921
SusWrite 513
224% 1,009 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 23.9
151% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 482
DQ Mixed 472
370% 513 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 163%
Great: 200%
SSD 512GB 512GB
414GB free
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 421 419 412 423 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 471
Write 410
Mixed 373
SusWrite 420
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 21.3
110% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 42.4
87% 171 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 211%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
120GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 116 126 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 144
Write 145
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 124
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 103%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
989GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 94 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 86.9
Write 90.4
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 94.7
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 67%
DmitryP UsbDisk 4GB
2GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 6.2
9% 7.75 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 42.4
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback