HP Elite x2 1011 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Elite x2 1011 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2009
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 14:25
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y71
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 30.8
2-Core 50.7
36% 50 Pts
4-Core 68.1
8-Core 103
11% 85.6 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300
HP(103C 2009) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 2.38
2% 2.25 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 3.65
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 187 210 225 228 241 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 332
Write 282
Mixed 167
SusWrite 219
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 24.6
65% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 173
137% 193 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 746448-382 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.7
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback