Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 13:09
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 865
89% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,045
65% 1,045 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625
MSI(1462 3892) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
155% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 234
Parallax 298
167% 246 fps
MRender 294
Gravity 233
Splatting 141
173% 222 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 155%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,608
Write 2,084
Mixed 1,357
446% 2,016 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 77.2
266% 96.3 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 830
614% 817 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
47GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 470 480 475 468 476 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 464
Mixed 434
SusWrite 472
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57.6
195% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 362
274% 369 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
16GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 427
Write 441
Mixed 310
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 41
150% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 180
159% 230 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 107%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
22GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 472
Mixed 346
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 44.1
158% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 173
176% 286 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 1TB
549GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 334 341 353 350 353 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 375
Write 341
Mixed 296
SusWrite 342
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 23.6
75% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 175
134% 181 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 77%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
61GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 469 476 430 247 319 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 474
Mixed 404
SusWrite 401
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 61
202% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 371
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 38.3
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 34.8
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback