Asus UL50VT

Performance Results

Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemAsus UL50VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UL50VT
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 10:01
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel U7300
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 62
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 52.6
34% 47.8 Pts
4-Core 52.1
8-Core 56.5
7% 54.3 Pts
64-Core 54.2
4% 54.2 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210M
Asus(1043 1AF2) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2
1% 1.88 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 33 34 37 14 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.2% Poor
Read 196
Write 171
Mixed 48
SusWrite 50.3
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 8.4
26% 8.47 MB/s
DQ Read 32.4
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 14.8
13% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical UL50VT Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UL50VT

The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $345Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback