Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 06:26
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 280
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 1,129
99% 842 Pts
64-Core 2,130
132% 2,130 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Nvidia(10DE 12FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.3% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 117
Parallax 111
94% 114 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 100
Splatting 83.5
85% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 488
Write 325
Mixed 263
79% 358 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 36
138% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 95.6
101% 166 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
931GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 439 443 449 449 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 449
Mixed 406
SusWrite 445
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 45.3
156% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 105%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 150 149 151 153 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 150
Mixed 83
SusWrite 149
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 150 149 145 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 126
Write 149
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 149
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 90%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
139GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 114 113 113 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 142
Write 116
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 113
151% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
169% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
161GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 112 114 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 146
Write 115
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 113
148% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
211% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 50.1
MC Write 44.3
MC Mixed 43.6
131% 46 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 35.6
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback