Fujitsu CELSIUS W570power

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W570power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3517-A1
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171011
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 22:03
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v6
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 87.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 235
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 656
66% 534 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 354.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 34.9
32% 37.9 fps
MRender 48.8
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 38.2
33% 41.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 842 618 612 607 607 608 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,822
Write 1,445
Mixed 907
SusWrite 649
268% 1,206 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 68.2
231% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,227
DQ Write 1,044
DQ Mixed 1,033
802% 1,102 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 235%
Great: 259%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
117GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 55 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 58.4
Write 63.1
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 56.9
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 51%
Seagate ST92503010AS 250GB
100GB free
Firmware: 0005LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 46.6
Write 44.3
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 73.6
36% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.9% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 21.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 21.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W570power Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W570power

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback