Asrock H61M-HVS

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-HVS (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120918
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '20 at 16:10
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1610-$37 5,236 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	50.3% Above average	Memory 77.9 1-Core 71.7 2-Core 138 58% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 133 18% 134 Pts	64-Core 136 8% 136 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0152) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5146 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 1.83 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 1.41 2% 1.7 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.65 2% 2.55 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X02c08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 162 162 165 168 168 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.4% Below average	Read 129 Write 161 Mixed 139 SusWrite 161 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 21.2 70% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 20.9 DQ Write 47 DQ Mixed 27.8 23% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 459GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 122 119 114 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 118 Write 112 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 116 72% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 10 10 10 11 11 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 11.3 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 10.2 19% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.5 101% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 1x4GB 1,692 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.53 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 84.6 47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-HVS Builds (Compare 518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVS - $64

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	52x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	43x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	32x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	72x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	36x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	11x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	17x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $389

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16