Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180608
Uptime15.5 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 16:08
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 73.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 767
78% 630 Pts
64-Core 1,336
83% 1,336 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 55.9
Parallax 45.7
45% 52.4 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 52.7
49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$146
759GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 361 384 368 357 336 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 446
Mixed 395
SusWrite 353
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 42.8
142% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 177
158% 236 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
357GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 384 403 389 372 349 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 466
Mixed 386
SusWrite 371
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 49.9
164% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 274
210% 286 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 107%
Great: 135%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1TB free
Firmware: HP23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 7.4 7.9 11 13 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z2666C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2Z2666C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 25.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $477
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback