Acer Swift SF713-51

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 75% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Acer Swift SF713-51 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Boxster_KL
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '17 at 13:32
Run Duration	93 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	88%
CPU Throttled	75%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7Y54 1,509 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 79.8 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 137 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 187 25% 187 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 11,115 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 1137) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4534 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	4.41% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 7.12 Parallax 5 4% 5.61 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 4.07 Splatting 9.3 6% 6.39 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.41% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG 256GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM00.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 304 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 410 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 13 (AA) Unknown 100 100 17 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 327686 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 66 (C2) HDA temperature 62 48 223339479078 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 893 (F1) Unknown 100 100 726 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1294 (F4) Unknown 100 100 5 (F5) Unknown 100 100 6 (F6) Unknown 100 100 355888	83.2% Excellent	Read 510 Write 430 Mixed 455 104% 465 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 9.82 101% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 76.4 DQ Mixed 9.98 53% 128 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4E6E304EB-EGCF 2x4GB 7,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	63.3% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 19.3 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 19.2 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Swift SF713-51 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF713-51

CPU
Core i5-7Y54IntelBench 47%, 1,509 samples	12x
Core i7-7Y75IntelBench 44%, 2,904 samples	9x

GPU
HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 3%, 11,115 samples	21x

SSD
CV3-SD512 512GBLiteonBench 74%, 61 samples	8x
RBUSNS4180S3256GG 256GBKingstonBench 69%, 95 samples	6x
CV3-SD256 256GBLiteonBench 74%, 146 samples	5x

RAM
K4E6E304EB-EGCF 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 7,516 samples	13x
H9CCNNNBLTBLAR-NUD 2x4GBHynixBench 62%, 1,005 samples	7x
H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GBHynixBench 58%, 6,118 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16