Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 145% UFO	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 162% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '20 at 08:42
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Memory 80.4 1-Core 149 2-Core 297 94% 175 Pts	4-Core 587 8-Core 1,118 101% 853 Pts	64-Core 2,047 127% 2,047 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8667) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	151% Outstanding	Lighting 205 Reflection 226 Parallax 235 167% 222 fps	MRender 262 Gravity 211 Splatting 131 157% 201 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$97 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 949 970 978 986 957 937 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	288% Outstanding	Read 2,453 Write 1,610 Mixed 236 SusWrite 963 290% 1,315 MB/s	4K Read 60 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 86.1 260% 85.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,278 DQ Write 936 DQ Mixed 588 580% 934 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 288% Great: 372%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 114GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 356 357 356 353 357 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 366 Mixed 291 SusWrite 356 83% 372 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 81.2 4K Mixed 36.8 139% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 106 106% 170 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 110%
Transcend SSD370 512GB-$173 1,585 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 32GB free Firmware: N1114H SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 264 153 151 155 149 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 479 Write 385 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 211 60% 272 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 27.8 79% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 155 124% 175 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 105%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 407GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 62 64 65 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 23.8 Write 54.8 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 63.8 31% 42 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 76%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1.5TB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 88 90 90 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 109 Write 111 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 89.4 63% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 92%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB 4,385 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 121 126 126 125 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	70% Very good	Read 119 Write 90.7 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 125 63% 88 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 88%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 3.5TB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 158 159 160 160 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 154 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 159 94% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 73,741 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 42.9 MC Write 36.3 MC Mixed 38.9 112% 39.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.9 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 34.4 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,640x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,409x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,072x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,466x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16