Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E5X-U01IN
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120614
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '20 at 07:37
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2310M-$80 25,542 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 75.5 1-Core 55.2 2-Core 38.7 42% 56.5 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 124 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 53.6 3% 53.6 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620M 539 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C652) 1GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.95% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 4.15 Parallax 1.78 3% 3.18 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 2.83 3% 3.79 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.95% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 87 118 134 154 160 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 384 Write 352 Mixed 155 SusWrite 144 58% 259 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 8.2 32% 9.33 MB/s	DQ Read 35.3 DQ Write 35.6 DQ Mixed 36.1 27% 35.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 340GB free Firmware: JE3O SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 68 69 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 66.4 Write 62.2 Mixed 37 SusWrite 67.9 43% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.1% Below average	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 15.2 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 12.4 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 89.3 45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	348x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	151x
Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples	93x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	500x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	247x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	200x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	71x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	24x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16