Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 06:36
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 69.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 295
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 920
88% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,339
83% 1,339 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
MSI(1462 3822) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Lighting 73.5
Reflection 53.3
Parallax 105
60% 77.3 fps
MRender 52
Gravity 73
Splatting 73.2
55% 66.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TN3Q-256G-1006 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 377 372 376 374 378 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 372
Mixed 237
SusWrite 373
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 40.2
152% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 144
142% 227 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 96%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
1.5TB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 489 491 492 492 493 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 492
Mixed 412
SusWrite 491
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 55.2
194% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 127%
Great: 135%
MIMOBOT 32GB
25GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 25 26 26 27 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 131
Write 58.1
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 27
79% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.4
117% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 25.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 25.1
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback