Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180208
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '20 at 01:59
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$320 176,031 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 82.2 1-Core 105 2-Core 211 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 816 76% 618 Pts	64-Core 1,199 80% 1,199 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$125 305,992 User benchmarks, average bench 47% PowerColor(148C 2379) CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.1% Average	Lighting 56.2 Reflection 59.7 Parallax 71.8 46% 62.6 fps	MRender 64 Gravity 56.9 Splatting 51.8 47% 57.5 fps
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDTR1TB-3D 1TB 319 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0518CS SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 441 443 446 447 448 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 453 Mixed 382 SusWrite 442 100% 442 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 74.4 4K Mixed 39.1 131% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 258 212% 300 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 114%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$180 115,586 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 91GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 464 466 467 469 470 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 478 Mixed 377 SusWrite 466 102% 455 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 90.7 4K Mixed 45.2 157% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 357 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 123%
Seagate 600 240GB-$215 2,579 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 183GB free Firmware: C675 SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 438 438 441 443 443 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 439 Mixed 334 SusWrite 439 96% 425 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 71.3 4K Mixed 33.5 120% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 254 215% 313 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 104%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$65 10,643 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 146GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 360 307 255 307 431 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 428 Mixed 334 SusWrite 346 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 75 4K Mixed 37.9 128% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 208 177% 257 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$70 136,739 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 295GB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 91 93 94 94 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 132 Write 126 Mixed 91.2 SusWrite 91.7 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$95 165,079 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 118 117 118 119 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 89 Write 89 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 117 70% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$74 97,461 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 147 145 150 151 152 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 84.7 Write 111 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 147 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.5 190% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 3,285 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 42.6 MC Write 37.8 MC Mixed 33.5 108% 38 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 40.2 SC Mixed 28.2 88% 30.7 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 2,126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 78%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $320Bench 71%, 176,031 samples	362x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $250Bench 74%, 96,502 samples	292x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $163Bench 72%, 337,028 samples	281x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $450Bench 105%, 736,321 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $330Bench 80%, 1,087,008 samples	197x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,090,662 samples	179x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $59Bench 106%, 530,736 samples	63x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 690,674 samples	63x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 198%, 208,751 samples	57x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $73Bench 81%, 479,768 samples	117x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $79Bench 84%, 440,338 samples	84x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $77Bench 85%, 204,681 samples	79x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $902

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $224	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-10400F $148	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $324	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)