HP ZBook Studio G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook Studio G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 826B
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200720
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 01:39
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 210
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 504
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1200
HP(103C 826B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 443.18
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 18.8
15% 18 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 16.5
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV512TBN-1AR15FCHA 512GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0F10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 359 351 231 229 226 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 378
Write 423
Mixed 358
SusWrite 295
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 28.1
94% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 180
136% 181 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 94%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
301GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 351 410 398 413 413 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 429
Write 419
Mixed 387
SusWrite 392
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 21.6
71% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 62.1
DQ Write 52.1
DQ Mixed 50.1
40% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 99%
Maxtor OneTouch 250GB
230GB free, PID 7350
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 35 36 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 34
Write 35
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 35.5
45% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 18%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
100GB free, PID a212
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 178
Write 163
Mixed 129
196% 157 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
89% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 25.3
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio G4 Builds (Compare 325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback