Acer Predator G9-792

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G9-792 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Challenger_SLS
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181002
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '20 at 20:45
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	96%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 77.9 2-Core 142 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 417 42% 338 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M 14,160 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Acer(1025 107D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5638 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.3% Below average	Lighting 45.3 Reflection 56.8 Parallax 43.9 37% 48.7 fps	MRender 40.7 Gravity 44.1 Splatting 51.8 38% 45.5 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB 18,578 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 573 580 549 497 334 339 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 1,052 Write 588 Mixed 392 SusWrite 479 139% 627 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 29.8 108% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 271 229% 332 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 332%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 50,772 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2BE10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 127 127 127 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 124 Write 90.4 Mixed 64 SusWrite 127 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 20,956 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	72.8% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 23 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 21.8 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G9-792 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G9-792

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	102x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	1x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	47x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	33x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	23x

SSD
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	11x
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples	10x
Raid 0 Volume 512GBIntelBench 191%, 18,578 samples	9x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	37x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 4x16GBHynixBench 73%, 569 samples	8x
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 71%, 938 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16