Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	32% Below average	Memory 46.5 1-Core 56 2-Core 85.8 38% 62.8 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 91.6 14% 98.7 Pts	64-Core 95.3 6% 95.3 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssstc CV8-8E128-HP 128GB 1,207 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: V881 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 127 137 128 135 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 386 Write 344 Mixed 337 SusWrite 153 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 72 4K Mixed 43.3 120% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 113 121% 202 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S1ME-4 1x4GB 1,275 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 6 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	265x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	142x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	110x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	357x
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	252x
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	113x

SSD
CV8-8E128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 66%, 7,685 samples	101x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	59x
CV8-8E128-HP 128GBSsstcBench 63%, 1,207 samples	39x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	199x
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 38%, 4,752 samples	55x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 34%, 6,590 samples	34x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16