Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191024
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '20 at 07:57
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	90% Excellent	Memory 93.6 1-Core 116 2-Core 200 80% 137 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 874 80% 669 Pts	64-Core 869 54% 869 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.1% Above average	Lighting 61.6 Reflection 67.1 Parallax 59.3 50% 62.6 fps	MRender 71.8 Gravity 58.7 Splatting 55.3 50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 356 345 347 351 347 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	174% Outstanding	Read 2,076 Write 2,154 Mixed 1,378 SusWrite 394 335% 1,500 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 56.7 203% 72.3 MB/s	DQ Read 47.2 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 223 132% 134 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 174% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 102GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 438 76 73 76 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 391 Write 467 Mixed 410 SusWrite 198 83% 366 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 96.1 4K Mixed 42.8 153% 56.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32.6 DQ Write 99 DQ Mixed 95.9 65% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 673GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 157 158 158 157 158 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 122 Write 160 Mixed 96.8 SusWrite 157 99% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.7 165% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 39.8 MC Write 41.1 MC Mixed 31.8 107% 37.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 39 SC Mixed 28.2 83% 29 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	186x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	166x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	150x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	114x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	112x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	102x

Value: 110% - Outstanding

Total price: $687

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16