HP Compaq

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 339A
Memory	1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1722 x 1070 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121029
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '20 at 22:14
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	91%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 62 1-Core 50.7 2-Core 119 46% 77.3 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 271 40% 290 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.8% Poor	Lighting 31.2 Reflection 27 Parallax 31 26% 29.7 fps	MRender 35.7 Gravity 30.7 Splatting 31.6 27% 32.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HCS721050CLA362 500GB 881 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA50G SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 49 48 51 59 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 94 Write 20.5 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 50.6 37% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 70% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GB 2,488 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 14.6 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 8.7 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	6x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	3x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	1x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	1x
PLUS 480 GB 480GBSandiskBench 45%, 8,604 samples	1x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	1x
PSD38G16002 2x8GBPatriotBench 52%, 6,044 samples	1x
M378B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 1,775 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16