Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5250-$90 962 User benchmarks, average bench 31% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 17.2 2-Core 34.5 30% 39.6 Pts	4-Core 34.6 8-Core 33.7 5% 34.2 Pts	64-Core 32.9 2% 32.9 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1108) 384MB Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.23% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.15 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.2 fps	MRender 0.19 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.26 0% 0.25 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.23% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4004RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 81 87 100 77 98 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.4% Below average	Read 236 Write 205 Mixed 134 SusWrite 106 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 7.3 45% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 90.7 DQ Write 70.3 DQ Mixed 35.2 39% 65.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.57 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.47 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16