Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	92.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '20 at 17:06
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 93.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 203 80% 137 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 554 56% 452 Pts	64-Core 555 34% 555 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.8% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 126 Parallax 108 95% 117 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 120 Splatting 101 88% 108 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 38 40 39 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 334 Write 38.7 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 36.9 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 51% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 193GB free Firmware: RVQ0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 176 182 124 83 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 344 Write 228 Mixed 248 SusWrite 137 53% 239 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 35.8 115% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 130 94% 123 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 121%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 85GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 93 95 95 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 160 Write 160 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 93.4 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 19GB free Firmware: 50.0AB50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 48 77 42 43 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 68.2 Write 60.2 Mixed 54 SusWrite 61 45% 60.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 59%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 47GB free Firmware: 04.04V02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 87 89 90 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 86.2 Write 84.2 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 86.6 59% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.3 236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 69%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 111GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 92 90 91 92 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.2% Below average	Read 90.7 Write 57.5 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 90.2 100% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 64%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 434 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 264GB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 99 97 104 104 102 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 147 Write 127 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 108 143% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5584-005.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5584-005.A00LF 16GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 18.2 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 18.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	444x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	358x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	117x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	38x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16